Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 131% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Memory - 134 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Memory - €12.9 vs €15.5 per FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €889.0 vs €1729.0
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1729
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Buy for €889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
391st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
391st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
44%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
