Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines HyperCube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Captiva - €1099.00 vs €1889.00
- Up to 28% better value when playing Battlefield V than Captiva - €6.46 vs €8.95 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield V than GameMachines HyperCube - - 211 vs 170 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
170
81%
Value, €/FPS
€6.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 898 minutes ago
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 902 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
