Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines HyperCube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Megaport - €1099.00 vs €1869.00
- Up to 7% better value when playing God of War than Megaport - €13.24 vs €14.27 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 58% better in God of War than GameMachines HyperCube - - 131 vs 83 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
83
63%
Value, €/FPS
€13.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Buy for €1,869 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
54th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
43%
GPU Winner
54th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
54th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
89%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |