Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper SYSTEMTREFF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SYSTEMTREFF is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 29% better in World of Tanks than SYSTEMTREFF - 323 vs 250 FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Captiva - €1089.90 vs €1889.00
- Up to 25% better value when playing World of Tanks than Captiva - €4.36 vs €5.85 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1667 minutes ago
210th Variation
FPS
250
77%
Value, €/FPS
€4.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1089.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,089.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1664 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
210th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
210th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
76%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
210th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
86%
Multi-Core
8910
60%
Captiva PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
