Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 outperforms the more expensive MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 160% better in Deathloop than MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- - 91 vs 35 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- - €1199.00 vs €1699.00
- Up to 73% better value when playing Deathloop than MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- - €13.18 vs €48.54 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
35
38%
Value, €/FPS
€48.54/FPS
27%
Price, €
€1699
70%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 428 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz) Gaming- Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
May 3rd, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |