Key Differences
In short — Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator Laptop
- Performs up to 26% better in New World than TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 - 98 vs 78 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 59% cheaper than Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator - €949.0 vs €2308.9
- Up to 48% better value when playing New World than Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator - €12.17 vs €23.56 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€23.56/FPS
51.655348047538205%
Price, €
€2308.9
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,308.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433 minutes ago
FPS
78
79.59183673469387%
Value, €/FPS
€12.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€949
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |