Key Differences
In short — Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator Laptop
- Performs up to 24% better in Counter-Strike 2 than TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 - 385 vs 310 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator - €919.0 vs €2395.91
- Up to 52% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator - €2.96 vs €6.22 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
385
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.22/FPS
47.58842443729904%
Price, €
€2395.91
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,395.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75791 minutes ago
FPS
310
80.51948051948052%
Value, €/FPS
€2.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€919
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED (BSF-A3DE964SQ) Creator Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 8th, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
