Key Differences
In short — TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 9% cheaper than TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 - €859.0 vs €949.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 - €28.63 vs €31.63 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
TULPAR T7 V20.8.2 Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
