The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6800 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 150 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
31%
Min 1% FPS
22
23%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
159
100%
Min 1% FPS
97
100%
Price, €
€1380.84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.68/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,380.84
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€712.56
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,089.98
In Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
11%
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.74 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 648 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 20.74 TFLOPS |
