The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 150 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 450% more VRAM memory – 11 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
47%
Min 1% FPS
22
37%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€1198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.19/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
18%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
37%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
21%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Memory
11 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
484.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
139.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.34 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 10th, 2017 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 11 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5X |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 352-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 139.2 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 354.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.34 TFLOPS |
