The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
The GeForce GTX 1070 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
61%
Min 1% FPS
22
51%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Average FPS
82
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, €
€998
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.17/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
37%
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
202 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.463 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 10th, 2016 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 202 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.463 TFLOPS |
