Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2174 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 30% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - €379.95 vs €542.00
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 35 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 169% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 105 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 47% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €5.16 vs €9.74 per FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 16 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€542
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
16%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
11%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$149 | MSRP | $499 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |