Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 77 days older than the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 60% better in Starfield than Radeon PRO W7500 - 48 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 30% better value when playing Starfield than Radeon PRO W7500 - €11.25 vs €16.05 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 16 vs 8 GB
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Up to 11% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - €481.39 vs €539.83
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 70 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
48
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€539.83
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €539.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for €481.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
55%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
May 18th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$499 | MSRP | $429 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
1x 16-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
2310 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2535 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |