Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX 6400 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX 6400 is 1690 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 6400
- Performs up to 1100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 12 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 97% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €11.67 vs €379.95 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6726 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
12
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6725 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
35%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Navi II |
$149 | MSRP | $159 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |