Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 803 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 22% better in The Outer Worlds than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 62 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 6 vs 4 GB
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€145.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €145.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
58%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Intel Arc A380 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |