Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A380 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A380 is 2490 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 29% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce GTX 950 - 94 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing No Man's Sky than GeForce GTX 950 - €1.5 vs €1.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 75 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Up to 16% cheaper than Arc A380 - €118.21 vs €140.72
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.72
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €140.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Buy for €118.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
43%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 900 |
$149 | MSRP | $159 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |