Buy on Amazon
€119.8
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 923 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Arc A310 - 61 vs 59 FPS
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 30 vs 50 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
ASRock Low Profile Intel ARC A310 LP 4G
Buy for €119.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
| 1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |
Similar GPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
