Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 2610 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than GeForce GTX 950 - 175 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than GeForce GTX 950 - €105.65 vs €158.72
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 30 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 4 vs 2 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €105.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74003 minutes ago
Buy for €158.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
73.64544976328247%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
98.21115398105927%
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |