Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A310 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A310 is 2610 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than GeForce GTX 950 - 64 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Valheim than GeForce GTX 950 - €1.87 vs €2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 30 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Up to 1% cheaper than Arc A310 - €118.21 vs €119.8
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.8
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €119.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Buy for €118.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |