Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1819 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 23 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 79% better in Immortals of Aveum than GeForce GT 425M - 25 vs 14 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 4 vs 1 GB
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 425M
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
