Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1460 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 23 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than GeForce GT 425M - 552 vs 488 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 2 vs 1 GB
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
GeForce 400M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |