Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1278 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 23 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 83% better in Control than GeForce GT 425M - 33 vs 18 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 3 vs 1 GB
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 400M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |