Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3374 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 58 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 74% better in Battlefield 1 than GeForce GT 220 - 92 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€190.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €190.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
9.00900900900901%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
15.444015444015447%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |