Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 19% better in Dirt 5 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 107 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - €144.99 vs €145.31
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - €1.36 vs €1.61 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13734 minutes ago
Buy for €145.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
38%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |