Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 680 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 6% better in FIFA 23 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 149 vs 140 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 9% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €143.0 vs €156.9
- Up to 3% better value when playing FIFA 23 than GeForce GTX 1650 - €1.02 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
97%
Price, €
€156.9
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €156.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
140
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |