Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 4642 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 81% cheaper than Arc A750 - €49.0 vs €259.0
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 24400% better in Overwatch 2 than GeForce GT 220 - 245 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 98% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than GeForce GT 220 - €1.06 vs €49.0 per FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€259
18%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |