Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 960 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 960 is 222 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 340 vs 326 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
90%
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | GeForce 900 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1127 MHz |
| 950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1178 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1753 MHz |
