Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 960 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 217 days newer than GeForce GTX 960.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 120 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 20% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce GTX 960 - 72 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 4 vs 2 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1178 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
