Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 364 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 35% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 35 vs 26 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
66%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |