Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 894 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 14% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 173 vs 152 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
82%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1125 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1201 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |