Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 758 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 140 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €135.59 vs €398.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €0.97 vs €2.91 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €135.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
94%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
94%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |