Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 950 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 950 is 654 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 35 vs 90 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 156 vs 146 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €112.15 vs €398.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €0.72 vs €2.73 per FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 616 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €112.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 616 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
68%
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 900 |
$149 | MSRP | $159 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |