Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 628 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 22% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €398.0 vs €510.37
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 23 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 184 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 6 vs 2 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74281 minutes ago
Buy for €510.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
22.951977401129945%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
22.960565038257798%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |