Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro W5500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W5500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 353 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro W5500.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 0% better in League of Legends than Radeon Pro W5500 - 370 vs 369 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5500 - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Up to 11% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €452.93 vs €510.37
- Up to 11% better value when playing League of Legends than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €1.23 vs €1.38 per FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
370
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
89%
Price, €
€510.37
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €510.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12464 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
FPS
369
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€452.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €452.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
96%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$279 | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1744 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1855 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |