Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 is 222 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
- Performs up to 12% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 55 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €128.45 vs €398.0
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74348 minutes ago
Buy for €128.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
41.88144329896907%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
67.02749140893471%
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$149 | MSRP | $109 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1354 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1455 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |