Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon 610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 3045 days older than Radeon 610M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 610M
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 40% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon 610M - 35 vs 25 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 610M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 610M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 400 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
