Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon 610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 3246 days older than Radeon 610M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 610M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 40% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon 610M - 14 vs 10 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 610M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
400 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |