Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Radeon 610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 3227 days older than Radeon 610M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 610M
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon 610M - 32 vs 25 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 610M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 610M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 400 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
