Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 111% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 133 vs 63 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$379.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |