Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 34% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 190 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$439
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |