Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 51% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 230 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
