Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 373 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Ryzen 5 3600 - 804 vs 797 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$167.61 vs CA$3175.00
- Up to 95% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$0.21 vs CA$3.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
804
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.95/FPS
5%
Price, CA$
CA$3175
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$3,175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7311 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
797
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7312 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |