Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 114 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 452 vs 427 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$288.31 vs CA$3175.00
- Up to 91% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$0.64 vs CA$7.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
427
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.44/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$3175
9%
Buy for CA$3,175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
452
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$288.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$288.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |