Buy on Amazon
CA$3,175
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $2749
Availability
MSRP $2749
AvailabilityMSRP $699
Availability
MSRP $699
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 805 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 289 vs 280 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 170 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
280
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$3175
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-core, 64-Thread Desktop Processor Without Cooler
Buy for CA$3,175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Raphael |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
