Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 16 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - CA$609.93 vs CA$639.43
- Up to 2% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-9900K - CA$2.23 vs CA$2.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 280 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$609.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$609.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
280
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.28/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$639.43
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$639.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |