Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$609.93 vs CA$629.99
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 289 vs 273 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$2.18 vs CA$2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.23/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$609.93
100%
Buy for CA$609.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$629.99
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |