Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5680 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5680 is 1170 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
