Buy on Amazon
CA$49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2605 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon X5675 - 456 vs 452 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
456
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
