Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1172 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon X5675 - 256 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
256
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |