Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2725 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Xeon X5650 - 109 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 16 vs 12 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |