Buy on Amazon
CA$44.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2774 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon W3670 - 378 vs 373 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
378
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
